🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.